This work is licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution/NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0
International Public License - CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-
sa/4.0/legalcode.es
Sinergias educativas
July - Septiembre Vol. 9 - 3 - 2024
http://sinergiaseducativas.mx/index.php/revista/
eISSN: 2661-6661
revistasinergias@soyuo.mx
Page 13-34
Received: March 14 , 2024
Approved: June 22 , 202
Educational quality as seen from the
perspective of pedagogical management,
innovation and learning environments:
A diagnostic study
La calidad educativa vista desde la gestión pedagógica,
la innovación y los ambientes de aprendizaje: Un
estudio diagnóstico
Somaris Fonseca Montoya
*
Martha Fernández Rodríguez
*
José Pablo Abreu Fernández
*
Magaly Granizo Coloma
*
Abstract
Pedagogical management, educational innovation and learning
environments are fundamental components that complement each
other to guarantee educational quality. The study presented here is
the result of the research project Quality of the educational process,
through pedagogical management, educational innovation and
learning environments, in institutions of the Ecuadorian General
Basic Education, developed by students and teachers of the Basic
Education course at the Instituto Superior Universitario Espíritu
Santos in the city of Guayaquil, and aims to characterise the current
state of the quality of educational processes, through pedagogical
management, educational innovation and learning environments, in
educational institutions in the city of Guayaquil. The research
followed a qualitative methodology of an exploratory and
hermeneutic type; methods such as analysis-synthesis and inductive-
Ph.D. Instituto Superior Universitario Espiritu Santo, Ecuador,
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0070-9741, sfonseca@tes.edu.ec
Ph.D. Instituto Superior Universitario Espiritu Santo, Ecuador,
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4765-7419,
mmfernandez@tes.edu.ec
Abg. Instituto Superior Universitario Espiritu Santo, Ecuador,
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8737-3832, jpabreu@tes.edu.ec
Msc. Instituto Superior Universitario Espiritu Santo, Ecuador,
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5585-5829, cmgranizo@tes.edu.ec
Article
Sinergias educativas
July - September Vol. 9 – 3 - 2024
http://sinergiaseducativas.mx/index.php/revista/
14
deductive were used, within the empirical methods observation,
survey, interview and documentary review were used; reaching the
conclusion that when pedagogical management, innovation and
learning environments are combined effectively, enriching
educational environments are created that promote academic
success, emotional well-being and the integral development of
students, which translates into educational quality.
Keywords: Educational quality, pedagogical management,
educational innovation, learning environments
Resumen
La gestión pedagógica, la innovación educativa y los ambientes de
aprendizaje son componentes fundamentales que se complementan
entre sí para garantizar calidad educativa. El estudio que se presenta
es resultado del proyecto de investigación Calidad del proceso
educativo, a través de la gestión pedagógica, la innovación educativa
y los ambientes de aprendizaje, en instituciones de la Educación
General Básica ecuatoriana, desarrollado por estudiantes y docentes
de la carrera de Educación Básica del Instituto Superior
Universitario Espíritu Santos de la ciudad de Guayaquil, y tiene por
objetivo caracterizar el estado actual de la calidad de los procesos
educativos, a través de la gestión pedagógica, la innovación
educativa y los ambientes de aprendizaje, en instituciones educativas
de la ciudad de Guayaquil. La investigación siguió una metodología
cualitativa de tipo exploratoria y hermenéutica; se utilizó métodos
como el análisis-síntesis y el inductivo deductivo, dentro de los
empíricos se utiliza la observación, la encuesta, la entrevista y la
revisión documental; llegando a la conclusión de que cuando la
gestión pedagógica, la innovación y los ambientes de aprendizaje se
combinan de manera efectiva, se crean entornos educativo
enriquecedor que promueve el éxito académico, el bienestar
emocional y el desarrollo integral de los estudiantes, lo que se
traduce en calidad educativa.
Palabras clave: Calidad educativa, gestión pedagógica, la
innovación educativa, ambientes de aprendizaje
Introduction
The quality of educational processes is achieved through a balanced
combination of effective pedagogical management, educational
innovation and appropriate learning environments. These elements
not only contribute to the academic development of students, but
Sinergias educativas
July - September Vol. 9 – 3 - 2024
http://sinergiaseducativas.mx/index.php/revista/
15
also prepare new generations to face the challenges of the 21st
century and contribute to the development of society.
Ensuring that students have access to a quality, equitable and
excellent education that prepares them to be active and competent
citizens in a constantly changing world is an aspiration of every
education system. The Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador
stipulates that "the quality of education is a responsibility of the
state", and Article 346 states that "there will be a public institution,
with autonomy, comprehensive and external evaluation, which
promotes the quality of education" (Ecuador, Asamblea Nacional
Constituyente, 2008).
Technology has transformed the way teaching and learning take
place; digital tools, online platforms and innovative educational
resources offer new opportunities to personalise learning, increase
access to education and improve the quality of teaching. However,
this poses a challenge in terms of effective integration of technology
in the classroom, teacher training and digital equity. Quality
education must harness the potential of technology to improve
learning outcomes and prepare students to be responsible digital
citizens.
According to Hernández (2017) cited by (España & Vigueras, 2021),
ICT are considered part of educational innovation because of their
different applications for teachers and students in the development
of skills planned in the classroom and dynamised with the purpose
of changing the current reality, ideas, attitudes and methods, as well
as to intervene and improve the teaching process.
On the other hand, effective pedagogical management implies
quality in planning, organising, directing and evaluating the
educational process, which includes appropriate selection of
teaching objectives, content, methods and evaluation, as well as
attention to the diversity of students. However, in practice, a solid
pedagogical management that encourages the active participation of
students and promotes learning environments conducive to the
development of cognitive, social and emotional skills has not yet
been achieved (Spain & Vigueras, 20).
(España & Vigueras, 2021), consider that the relationship that exists
between planning and innovation with respect to the quality of
education is that both are aimed at the search for relevance and socio-
cultural nuances through the subjects who learn, who are the
spokespersons of social structural change.
Sinergias educativas
July - September Vol. 9 – 3 - 2024
http://sinergiaseducativas.mx/index.php/revista/
16
The article presents the main results of the diagnosis of the research
project "Quality of the educational process", carried out by students
and teachers of the Basic Education course at the Instituto Superior
Espíritu Santos in the city of Guayaquil, and its objective is to
characterise the current state of the quality of educational processes,
through pedagogical management, educational innovation and
learning environments.
Materials and methods
The research responds to a qualitative methodology, due to the active
and participatory participation of the research subjects in the study,
and its flexible design allows for the incorporation of unforeseen
findings for a better characterisation of the educational process,
through pedagogical management, educational innovation and
learning environments. The research is exploratory and hermeneutic,
its purpose is to analyse and interpret the information gathered from
the experience of the actors involved and the relevant documents that
regulate education; this allows for a holistic understanding of the
object of study based on evidence of the key aspects related to
educational quality: pedagogical management, educational
innovation and learning environments.
The scientific methods used are theoretical, analysis-synthesis and
inductive-deductive, which allow the authors to collect, analyse and
interpret information on educational quality, pedagogical
management, educational innovation and learning environments;
empirical methods used are observation, survey, interview and
documentary review; also used as a mathematical-statistical method
is the percentage analysis.
The research sample is made up of 90 basic education teachers, 233
students, 8 DECE professionals and 11 directors of private and
public educational institutions in the city of Guayaquil. The sample
of students is shown in Table 1.
Table 1. Sample of students
Muestra
Cantidad de estudiantes
Estudiantes Instituciones
privadas
62%
Estudiantes Instituciones públicas
38%
Sinergias educativas
July - September Vol. 9 – 3 - 2024
http://sinergiaseducativas.mx/index.php/revista/
17
Estudiantes sexo Femenino
55%
Estudiantes sexo Masculino
45%
Estudiantes de Básica Media
45%
Estudiantes de Básica Superior
54%
In the data collection process, a survey was applied to basic
education students in order to obtain information to characterise the
educational process through pedagogical management, educational
innovation and learning environments; semi-structured interviews
were also conducted with directors, DECE professionals and basic
education teachers from private and public educational institutions
in the city of Guayaquil.
Results
The diagnosis assumes the pedagogical and administrative
management dimensions established by MINEDUC by the National
System of Evaluation and Social Accountability (Ecuador, Ministry
of Education):
In relation to the pedagogical management dimension, the main
results of the survey of 90 basic education teachers from private and
public educational institutions in the city of Guayaquil are presented
first.
In response to the question related to diagnosis and its role in
curriculum design, the following results are presented: 47% of
teachers state that they sometimes carry out curriculum planning
based on the results of the diagnosis, 24% respond that they always
use this technique as a starting point for curriculum planning, and
29% admit that they do not carry out diagnosis prior to curriculum
design and planning (see Table 2).
The lack of diagnosis for curriculum planning represents a
significant challenge in the educational field, because this technique
provides valuable information on the needs, skills and knowledge of
students, which is essential for the design and planning of the
curriculum at all levels. When the starting point is not a diagnosis,
curriculum planning does not respond to the individual needs of each
Sinergias educativas
July - September Vol. 9 – 3 - 2024
http://sinergiaseducativas.mx/index.php/revista/
18
student, which means an education that is not very inclusive; in this
case, teaching does not adjust to the reality of the students, causing
their lack of motivation for learning.
With regard to the question related to the design of study materials
and teaching resources in accordance with the curriculum planning,
57% of the teachers surveyed stated that they do design study
materials and teaching resources in accordance with the curriculum
planning; however, 38% of the teachers stated that they do not (see
table 2). The results of this question have implications for the quality
of the educational process, because when teachers design study
materials and teaching resources in line with curriculum planning,
there is a greater likelihood of systematicity and coherence in student
learning. This ensures that the content taught is in line with the
established objectives, which promotes meaningful and
developmental learning.
35% of the teachers consider that they promote reflection, enquiry,
analysis and debate in their classes; 58% only achieve this
sometimes and 7% never (see table 2); this indicates that there is a
significant gap between the intention and practice of promoting
reflection, enquiry, analysis and debate in the classes. The fact that
only 35% of teachers consider that they do this consistently indicates
that there is an important area for improvement in teaching. The
discrepancy between intention and practice may be subject to a
variety of reasons, such as: teachers with little capacity to integrate
active methodologies into lessons effectively, pressures to comply
with the curriculum, assessment standards, and other external factors
that also play a role in this problem, such as class time and resources
available to devote to activities that encourage in-depth reflection
and discussion.
With regard to the appropriate use of ICT in the teaching-learning
process, 49% of the teachers surveyed consider that they always
promote the appropriate use of ICT in their classes; however, it is
important to bear in mind that 36% of the teachers consider that they
only sometimes achieve this and 14% state that they never promote
the appropriate use of technological tools in the teaching-learning
process (see table 2).
This response highlights an important concern about the effective
use of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in the
teaching-learning process. While a significant percentage of teachers
claim to always promote the appropriate use of these tools, there is a
considerable proportion who recognise difficulties in achieving this
Sinergias educativas
July - September Vol. 9 – 3 - 2024
http://sinergiaseducativas.mx/index.php/revista/
19
goal. This gap can be attributed to various factors, such as the poor
development of computer skills, limited space for teacher
preparation in relation to the effective use of ICT in the classroom,
and last but not least, the fact that technological or infrastructural
barriers hinder their integration.
According to the survey of Basic Education teachers, the
technological resources most used by teachers in the teaching-
learning process are: videos, PowerPoint presentations and social
networks; and the least used are: discussion forums, infographics,
software and Prezi.
The fact that the technological resources most used by teachers in
the teaching-learning process are videos, PowerPoint presentations
and social networks reflects the prevalence of multimedia tools and
communication platforms in the current educational environment.
Videos are an effective tool for presenting information in a visual
and dynamic way, allowing teachers to incorporate multimedia
content, such as images, graphics and animations, to enrich the
students' learning experience. PowerPoint presentations, on the other
hand, allow information to be organised and presented in a structured
and visually appealing way, which facilitates students'
understanding and retention of concepts; and social networks
encourage debate and discussion, and promote students' active
participation in the teaching and learning process.
On the other hand, the least used technological resources according
to the results of this question may reflect less familiarity or
accessibility on the part of teachers, as well as technical or
infrastructure barriers that limit their adoption.
When teachers were asked whether they allow students to question
their learning and seek alternative explanations or solutions to their
questions, results were obtained that highlight a crucial dynamic in
the teaching-learning process: fostering students' ability to question
their learning and seek alternative explanations or solutions to their
questions. The distribution of responses among the teachers
surveyed reveals a variety of approaches and practices in this regard.
The fact that 50% of teachers consider that they always allow
students to question their learning and seek alternative explanations
or solutions indicates a strong commitment to the development of
critical thinking and student autonomy. This approach suggests an
openness to exploration, experimentation and debate within the
classroom, which can foster a dynamic and developmental learning
environment (see table 2).
Sinergias educativas
July - September Vol. 9 – 3 - 2024
http://sinergiaseducativas.mx/index.php/revista/
20
Another important finding from the teacher survey is the fact that
only 20% of teachers responded that they develop innovative
practices in the teaching-learning process, suggesting that innovation
is not yet a widespread feature in education. This may be due to a
variety of factors, such as lack of training in new pedagogical
methodologies, resistance to change, or lack of resources and
institutional support for the implementation of educational
innovations (see Table 2).
The innovative strategies most frequently used in the classroom by
teachers are: Project Based Learning (PBL), Educational
Gamification, Cooperative Learning and Technology Integration;
and the least used are: Flipped Classroom, Adaptive Teaching and
Virtual and Augmented Reality.
The preference for these innovative strategies reflects the growing
importance of student-centred pedagogical approaches and the use
of digital tools to enhance the educational experience and foster
meaningful learning. Project Based Learning (PBL) is a strategy that
engages students in solving real-world problems through the
completion of projects; on the other hand; Educational Gamification
incorporates elements such as challenges, rewards and competitions,
gamification increases student participation and engagement with
their learning. Cooperative Learning promotes collaboration among
students to achieve common goals. This strategy fosters teamwork,
effective communication and the development of social skills, while
promoting a supportive and comradely atmosphere in the classroom;
and the Integration of Technology in the classroom is fundamental
to prepare students for the digital world in which they live.
Another result obtained, in relation to learning environments,
specifically the use of laboratories, indicates that few teachers use
laboratories for lectures and/or practicals. The fact that 52% of the
teachers surveyed do not use the laboratories for lectures and/or
practicals suggests a significant under-utilisation of these resources.
Laboratories provide a practical and experimental environment that
can complement and enrich theoretical teaching in many disciplines,
from the sciences to the arts. The lack of utilisation of these spaces
can limit opportunities for hands-on learning and active exploration
of concepts and theories by students (see table 2).
Within the Pedagogical Management criterion, the response to the
last question indicates that more than 50% (see table 2) of the
teachers surveyed agree that pedagogical management, educational
innovation and learning environments complement each other and
Sinergias educativas
July - September Vol. 9 – 3 - 2024
http://sinergiaseducativas.mx/index.php/revista/
21
ensure quality education. The consensus among the majority of
teachers surveyed on the relationship between these components
highlights the importance of a holistic approach to ensure quality
education.
Pedagogical management is fundamental in laying the foundations
for an effective learning environment. On the other hand,
educational innovation encourages the use of new methodologies,
technologies and pedagogical approaches that promote meaningful
and developmental learning. Innovative practices in education
enable the design of inclusive educational programmes and the
implementation of active, participatory and collaborative teaching
methods. Educational innovation challenges traditional practices and
seeks to optimise the teaching-learning process in order to improve
educational processes. Learning environments play a crucial role in
educational success. A good learning environment promotes active
student participation, fosters collaboration and the exchange of ideas
and experiences, and creates opportunities for exploration and
discovery. Together, effective pedagogical management,
educational innovation and appropriate learning environments
complement each other to ensure quality education.
Table 2. Pedagogical management survey results.
1. ¿Realizas diagnóstico como punto de partida para la
Planificación Curricular?
Siempre
22
24%
A veces
42
47%
Nunca
26
29%
2. ¿Diseñas materiales de estudio y recursos didácticos, de
acuerdo con la planificación curricular?
Siempre
51
57%
A veces
34
38%
Nunca
5
5%
3. ¿En las clases promueves la reflexión, la indagación, el
análisis y el debate?
Sinergias educativas
July - September Vol. 9 – 3 - 2024
http://sinergiaseducativas.mx/index.php/revista/
22
Siempre
32
35%
A veces
52
58%
Nunca
6
7%
4. ¿Promueves el uso adecuado de las TIC dentro del proceso
de aprendizaje los estudiantes?
Siempre
44
49%
A veces
32
36%
Nunca
14
15%
5. ¿Los estudiantes cuestionan su aprendizaje y buscan
alternativas de solución a sus cuestionamientos?
Siempre
52
50%
A veces
33
42%
Nunca
5
8%
6. ¿Desarrollas prácticas innovadoras en el PEA?
Siempre
18
20%
A veces
63
70%
Nunca
9
10%
7. ¿Utilizas